Comparison of stabilities between obliquely and conventionally inserted Bagby and Kuslich cages as posterior lumbar interbody fusion in a cadaver model.

نویسندگان

  • Shih-Tien Wang
  • Vijay K Goel
  • Shinichiro Kubo
  • Woosung Choi
  • Justin K Coppes
  • Chien-Lin Liu
  • Tain-Hsiung Chen
چکیده

BACKGROUND The Bagby and Kuslich (BAK) cage as posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is reported to give satisfactory results in restoring spinal stability. Moreover, correction by obliquely inserting a single BAK cage has the advantages of reducing exposure, precise implantation, and lower cost. However, biomechanical data on this procedure are not abundant. This study was designed to compare the stability imparted by the cages placed using an oblique and posterior approaches and to determine the effects of supplementary posterior instrumentation. METHODS After affixing nine human cadaveric spines (L2-S1) within a testing frame, load testing in several clinically relevant modes was performed sequentially for the intact and the following procedures across the L4-5 segments: posterior destabilization, stabilization using 2 parallel BAK cages (CBAK group) or 1 oblique BAK cage (OBAK group), and additional stabilization with posterior instrumentation. Spatial locations of vertebral bodies were recorded after each loading step using a 3-D motion measurement system. RESULTS Except the OBAK group that had a lower stability in left axial rotation, there were no significant differences in the stability between both groups in all loading modes for the stabilization using cages alone. Compared with the intact cases, CBAK cages provide significant improvement in the stability in 5 displacement modes and OBAK cage may restore the stabilities of the specimens to the intact state in 5 modes and provide significant improvement in flexion. Addition of supplementary posterior instrumentation significantly reduced the angular displacements in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Both methods of cage insertion have similar stability. Both implantations, alone or with posterior instrumentation, may improve the stability of the spine, although posterior instrumentation may further strengthen the stability. The oblique insertion is more favorable since it requires less exposure, enables precise implantation, and is less expensive.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Curb the Pain of Spondylolisthesis; Comparing Posterolateral Fusion with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Background & Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the pain of patients with spondylolisthesis who had undergone either of the surgery techniques: posterolateral fusion (PLF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Methods & Materials/Patients: In a prospective observational study, 102 surgical candidates with low grade degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis were e...

متن کامل

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of The Stabilis Stand Alone Cage (SAC) Versus Bagby and Kuslich (BAK) Implants for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

BACKGROUND Degenerative disc disease is common and debilitating for many patients. If conservative extensive care fails, anterior lumbar interbody fusion has proven to be an alternative form of surgical management. The Stabilis Stand Alone Cage(SAC) was introduced as a method to obtain stability and fusion. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Stabilis Stand Alone Cage (SAC) i...

متن کامل

Can Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation and Fusion Be Overpowered by Anterior Lumbar Fusion With Hyperlordotic Cages? A Cadaveric Study

STUDY DESIGN Technical report on cadavers. OBJECTIVE To evaluate preliminary feasibility and safety of lumbar sagittal alignment correction with anterior hyperlordotic cages used to overpower previous posterior spinal instrumentation. METHODS Hyperlordotic 30° anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) cages were inserted in collapsed L5-S1 disc space of 2 cadavers to overpower prior posterior...

متن کامل

Comparison of outcomes and safety of using hydroxyapatite granules as a substitute for autograft in cervical cages for anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion

Background:   After cervical discectomy, autogenetic bone is packed into the cage to increase the rate of union between adjacent vertebral bodies, but donor site–related complications can still occur. In this study we evaluate the use   of hydroxyapatite granules as a substitute for autograft for interbody fusion.     Methods:   From November 2008 to November 2011, 236 patients participated in ...

متن کامل

Comparison of Supplementary Posterior Fixations for Two-Level ALIF with Stand-Alone Cages

INTRODUCTION: Structural cages have been widely used in recent years to maintain motion segment height and stability in anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). High rate of clinical success and radiological fusion rate have been reported following single-level fusion using these cages. However, many biomechanical studies report insufficient stability, especially with extension loading. Posteri...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA

دوره 66 11  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003